Bernard van Gastel, universitair docent en trekker van het focusgebied Duurzame Data bij NOLAI
Bernard van Gastel, universitair docent en trekker van het focusgebied Duurzame Data bij NOLAI

Energy Consumption of AI in Schools: Know What You’re Doing!

In the midst of everything the Netherlands has to offer in ICT and AI, Bernard van Gastel spoke at the IPON conference about how much energy this technology actually costs us. He believes it can—and must—be made more sustainable. AI in education is homework for both the ICT sector and schools. Food for thought!

Bernard van Gastel, a university lecturer in ICT and one of NOLAI’s leading figures on sustainable data, made one thing clear straight away: “Increasingly, questions are being asked about the energy consumption of AI, but the same applies to ICT applications. As far as I’m concerned, there is no difference: it’s the same computers performing calculations, and that takes energy—and too often unnoticed. And in addition to energy, it’s also about space and water usage.”

What Are We Talking About?

The amount of energy required to process data is hard for most people to picture. Bernard explains: “On a site that is 1.5 × the size of the Nijmegen campus, the energy consumption of the data centre in Zeewolde was estimated at 1,380 GWh per year for 400 employees. Compare that to the 44 GWh per year used on the campus itself, which hosts many university buildings, laboratories and an academic hospital with 17,000 employees and another 24,000 students. That gives – albeit only a rough idea – a sense of what we’re really talking about.”

Universitair docent Bernard van Gastel hield op IPON2026 een keynote over het energieverbruik van ICT en AI
Hoeveel energie kost ICT en AI op scholen?

Data Hunger Is Growing

Around the world AI is driving the addition of ever more servers. In 2024 the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimated the global electricity consumption of data centres at 415 terawatt‑hours per year, roughly 1.5 % of total electricity use. That may sound modest, but the figure jumped a striking 12 % in just five years. It becomes a serious problem when energy sources are scarce and the planet’s capacity to absorb CO₂ is dwindling (see NOS).No new wind farm can offset that. A recent article in Nature titled Light bulbs have energy ratings – so why can’t AI chatbots underlines the issue.

What Works Partly: More Efficient Programming

A seemingly simple solution that is not yet widely applied is energy-efficient programming. Bernard says: “We certainly need to do that. At NOLAI, we are calculating the energy consumption of all projects in which educational AI prototypes are being developed. As always, measuring is knowing! We do this in our Software Energy Lab. But that's not enough. We have known about the Jevons paradox since 1865: efficiency lowers costs, increasing demand and consequently increasing total consumption. More efficient programming is necessary, but it’s not the solution. More needs to be done, and schools can also play their part.” Bernard’s research also shows that opportunities lie on the organizational side. By setting lower requirements – for example, only agreeing that systems are always available during school hours – or by looking at green hosting and using hardware for longer, improvements can be made.

Universitair docent Bernard van Gastel hield op IPON2026 een keynote over het energieverbruik van ICT en AI
Universitair docent Bernard van Gastel tijdens zijn keynote op IPON2026

What Really Works: Conscious Use in Schools

Bernard gives schools 8 tips to be more aware of energy consumption. Because schools want to do this, but often don’t know how or where to start. Schools considering new ICT or AI applications can get to work with this concretely. Also see the whitepaper for an easy-to-print checklist:

  1. Question your suppliers
    Providers of ICT and AI are still too rarely asked about the consumption of their products. Not only the costs of purchase and management are important, but also the electricity consumption – there can be significant differences. Also good for the wallet, a win-win.
  2. Stick to the purpose
    People tend to apply new technology because it's new, not because it necessarily adds something. Remember that AI and ICT are ‘just’ supporting tools, if the support doesn’t directly connect to learning and teaching, something is wrong.
  3. Follow the data
    Know what is being consumed at school and by what. Create an overview in the way that suits you, even if it’s on the back of a napkin. Start by mapping all data streams. What kind of data is there, where is it stored, and how is this data exchanged? We do this for our projects too, and it turns out that there are often blind spots that are quickly overlooked. But that’s where opportunities for sustainability (or privacy risks) can lie.
  4. Pay attention to the time
    Especially in schools, not everything needs to be available 24/7. Letting go of that requirement already saves a lot of energy. Pause school systems, such as the internet connection, in the evenings, weekends or school holidays.
  5. Dare to let go
    Where bulging archive cabinets used to automatically ensure regular clean-up, all that online information is now out of sight. Agree on clear maximum storage periods for data. It can be very generous, as long as it's gone when it's no longer useful. Not cleaning up should be difficult, but extending it should be easy. Otherwise, we will suffer from data obesity.
  6. Remain a free spirit
    Large technology providers know how to trap you so that it becomes almost impossible to switch. This is called vendor lock-in, an increasing problem. So ask about cancellation terms and switching options, even if you are not (and perhaps never) going to do so. That way, you can also switch to green products in the future.
  7. Extend use as long as possible
    For ‘end-user’ devices like smartphones and laptops, it is especially true that production costs are burdensome, not so much their use. Then it is important to extend the use for as long as possible. Maybe that laptop can last another year, with or without minor repairs…
  8. Keep it small
    General AI, such as ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot, is designed for large, complex calculations. Often, not all that capacity is needed for the solution you were looking for. Aside from privacy and sovereignty issues, this is a very good reason to choose custom AI, or educational AI. More specific models deliver higher quality for that specific purpose, and can also be better researched for responsible use in schools. And these more specific models use less energy because they are smaller.
     

Contact information

Organizational unit
National Education Lab AI (NOLAI)
Theme
Artificial intelligence (AI)