GitHub has become a widely-used platform for managing code, collaborating on software projects, and supporting reproducible research. As the platform is owned by Microsoft, and recently started training its AI models on user data without users’ consent, growing attention to digital sovereignty and research integrity has prompted researchers and institutions to reflect whether alternatives are available. One such alternative could be Codeberg, a European non-profit platform that offers many of the same core functionalities as GitHub while operating under a community-driven governance model.
In this lecture, we will explore the similarities and differences between GitHub and Codeberg, discuss the broader concept of digital sovereignty, and consider the pros and cons of both platforms. Whether you are already using GitHub or Codeberg, or simply interested in the future of research infrastructure, this session will provide valuable insights and an opportunity for discussion.
Programme – Moderator Marieke Woensdregt, Assistant Professor at Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence
- Digital Sovereignty: Why Does It Matter?
Hedy Bulten, Security Officer
An introduction to digital sovereignty and its relevance for research, data, and software infrastructure. - GitHub and Codeberg Explained
Linus Band, Research Software Trainer and Data Steward, Digital Competence Centre
A practical overview of both platforms, their strengths and limitations, and considerations for researchers. - Researcher Perspective: Experiences from AI Research
Speaker to be confirmed
An AI researcher shares practical experiences, challenges, and considerations in choosing a platform for managing and sharing code. - Open Discussion
An opportunity to exchange ideas and perspectives on the question Github or Codeberg - For whom is this interesting?
Researchers, research software engineers, data stewards, and anyone working with code/software and/or interested in digital sovereignty and/or open science.