Marloes van Engen poseert voor neutrale achtergrond
Marloes van Engen poseert voor neutrale achtergrond

Subtle exclusion at work: small incidents with major consequences

Employees who are subtly excluded at work often fail to realise for a long time exactly what is happening. It involves seemingly minor incidents such as a missed invitation, an update being withheld or a joke that comes across the wrong way. The signs are so subtle that employees initially doubt themselves or think it is a misunderstanding. Research by Radboud University, Tilburg University and TIAS School for Business and Society shows that employees actually try even harder to fit in, whilst the psychological pressure increases.

The researchers, including Associate Professor of Transformation Management Marloes van Engen, interviewed 26 employees from various sectors about their real-world experiences and published their findings in Academy of Management Discoveries. Van Engen: “In our field, it is commonly assumed that employees realise when they are being excluded. However, our research shows that, initially, they actually struggle with uncertainty about the cause. Employees start working harder, avoid conflicts or become extra helpful.”

Based on the study’s findings, the researchers developed the ‘Subtle Workplace Exclusion Attributions and Reactions’ (SWEAR) model. Central to this model is the mental tipping point: the moment when employees realise that these recurring experiences are no coincidence and that the cause does not lie with them. This realisation often arises from an accumulation of multiple incidents, a comparison of themselves with colleagues, or external cues – such as when someone close to them points out a pattern.

SWEAR model
SWEAR model

After such a turning point, reactions often change dramatically. Employees speak to colleagues or managers, involve HR (Human Resources), develop symptoms of burnout or decide to leave the organisation. According to the researchers, this is problematic because by that time organisations have often already missed signs for months or even years. Van Engen: “It is important that subtle exclusion is not viewed as an individual conflict, but as an organisational risk. Managers have a responsibility to recognise signs such as excessive overtime, withdrawal behaviour or employees who say they do not feel at home in the team at an early stage and to raise these issues for discussion.”

Read more about this research here.

Contact information

More information? Please get in touch with the researcher.