Might Baroque Rome have been home to an “Enlightenment” of its own?
Had seventeenth-century Rome embraced modern science and experimental philosophy, coming to terms with atomism and the void, and accepting the notion of a cosmos ruled by mechanical laws, Europe might have known a very different Enlightenment. This statement might appear obvious, but the disbelief instilled by the Enlightenment that an alternative scenario was even possible in Catholic Rome has shaped a view that has remained unquestioned. In fact, precisely because of the toll exacted by the Counter-Reformation on the new science, Rome became a unique laboratory for reconciling the new mechanical and experimental philosophies developed in northern countries with the Christian faith that the papacy wished to protect.
About the project
As the condemnation of Galileo in 1633 made clear, Rome chose not to embrace the scientific revolution, fearing mostly a regime change. But, between 1670 and 1720, literary and scientific academic circles in Rome, with the support of a group of cardinals in the papal court, engaged in softly reinstating that revolution, in a form that was compatible with the tenets of religion. With the scientific supervision of Prof. Dr. Antonio Clericuzio (Roma Tre University – Rome), this RUBICON project founded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) aims to investigate the nature of the ideals, programs, and chances of this attempted transition into modernity, starting from a re-examination of the academic culture and its institutions in Rome at the end of the century.