Binnenhof, Den Haag
Binnenhof, Den Haag

How many promises did the Schoof government keep? A new tracker reveals the answer

It is a recurring question in society: which promises has the government kept and which not? To provide a complete answer to this question, two Master's students in Political Science at Radboud University are developing an online tracker with the current status of all the promises of the Schoof government. “With this tracker, we hope to close the gap between complex legislation and citizens.”

It is already in common usage in Germany, where both the government and independent media maintain websites that show which government promises have and have not (or not yet) been fulfilled. “We were surprised to hear there wasn’t anything like this in the Netherlands yet,” says Master's student in Political Science Rik Hazelaar. Together with fellow student Niek Rijks, in the context of their research internship, he is developing an online tracker: a website that tracks the promises of the Schoof government's coalition agreement. “Because for voters, it is essential to see what has become of the government's intentions.”

Although the media offers fragmented coverage of the progress of government promises, according to the two students from the Applied Political Theory specialisation, there is as yet no overall overview of the current status of all promises. “There is a government website where you can check how parties are voting on motions and legislation, but that hardly provides any context about their political responsibilities,” Hazelaar clarifies. “With our tracker, we want to provide that full responsibility context.”

A mountain of government information

Hazelaar and Rijks delved into the Schoof government's coalition agreement to filter out all their intentions and promises. For their tracker, they organise all the promises into different policy areas, such as ‘getting a grip on asylum and migration’, ‘socio-economic security’, ‘international security’ and ‘healthcare’. Under all these policy categories, they indicate for each promise whether or not work on it has already started, whether the promise has/has not/has partially been fulfilled, or whether there is a status quo. 

“To clarify the status of all those promises, we had to sort through a mountain of government information,” explains Rijks. “Think of all the motions, letters to and from ministers, and legislative documents from the Senate and House of Representatives. In the Netherlands, all that information is scattered across various government websites, which makes it rather confusing. As a result, it was quite a challenge to systematically collect the status of all government promises and to organise it all for the ‘ordinary Dutchman’.”

Multiple target groups

According to Rijks, the tracker basically targets ordinary citizens: people who are further removed from politics. “We want to give people more insight into the progress of government promises. This can be important if there is a feeling in society that the government and politicians rarely deliver on their promises. When confidence in the government is low, this can affect the credibility of democracy. For example, the tracker could show that people's negative perception is false because a government really is working on or has even already fulfilled many of its promises. However, if it’s true that the government is failing to do lots of the things they promised to do, the tracker can of course also be used to highlight this. With our project, we mostly hope to close the gap between complex legislation and citizens.”

Screenshot van tracker van beloftes kabinet-Schoof

Marcel Wissenburg, Professor of Political Theory, is supervising the two Radboud students in their research internships, together with Associate Professors Maurits Meijers and Andrej Zaslove. Wissenburg believes that investigative media can also benefit greatly from the tracker. “As can the politicians themselves,” he suspects. “Indeed, politicians are increasingly engaging in serious fact-checking. The tracker forms a solid database to refer back to in debates. And I also think scientists could benefit from this tracker, because it justifies the research methodology. For example, the tracker makes it clear what criteria were used to determine whether a cabinet promise is fulfilled or not and on what source this conclusion was based.” Rijks adds: “According to our tracker, a promise isn’t fulfilled until it is fully delivered, as stated in the coalition agreement.”

Hazelaar and Rijks plan to launch the tracker in late September, before the House of Representatives elections on 29 October. According to Hazelaar, they learned a lot from their research. “In the Schoof administration's coalition agreement, we noticed that for some promises, they were building on legislation already initiated by the previous administration. To make this transparent, we decided to add which cabinet was the initiator of each bill in our tracker. That way we can provide a fair picture, because legislation often takes years to materialise.” Will there also be a new tracker for the next cabinet? Rijks: “We hope so. Perhaps in future we could work towards a tracker in which you can compare the coalition programme of a new cabinet with that of previous cabinets. But let's launch the current tracker first, then we’ll see.”

Contact information

Theme
Current affairs, Politics, Society