| | | | Cursus | | NWI-IPI004 | Categorie | | BA (Bachelor) | Voertaal | | Engels | Aangeboden door | | Radboud Universiteit; Faculteit der Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Informatica; Informatica en Informatiekunde; | Docenten | | | | Collegejaar | | 2019 | | Periode | | KW3-KW4 | (03-02-2020 t/m 30-08-2020) |
| Aanvangsblok | | KW3 | |
| Onderwijsvorm | | voltijd | |
| Opmerking | | Studenten voor wie de cursus verplicht is hebben voorrang. | Inschrijven via OSIRIS | | Ja | Inschrijven voor bijvakkers | | Ja | Voorinschrijving | | Nee | Wachtlijst | | Nee | Plaatsingsprocedure | | Volgorde bepaald door opl./programma | Toelichting | | Volgorde bepaald door opleiding/programma |
| | | | | |
After completing this course participants are able to:
- General competencies:
- detect inconsistencies and mistakes in wrongly formulated statements
- formulate clear, consistent and correct assertions
- provide argumentation about the correctness of your own assertions
- systematically derive solutions
- make unclear assertions clear
- structurize text using definitions
- create simple proofs by structural induction
- Specific competencies with respect to logic:
- deal in a professional way with different notations for intrinsically the same language
- recognize which problems can be solved and which problems cannot be solved using propositional logic
- translate natural language assertions into logic in a systematic way
- present the semantics of formulas in propositional or predicate logic in a clear way in natural language
- explain the semantics of the rules for natural deduction
- prove assertions using natural deduction
- present proofs in a comprehensible way
- derive truth tables for assertions in propositional logic
- derive semantic tableaux for assertions in propositional logic
- use the terminology of tautology, logical consequences, and logical equivalences
- recognize and indicate mistakes within proofs
- use the proof assistant Coq to prove theorems
- derive the Kripke semantics of formulas in modal logic
- Specific competencies with respect to system modeling:
- create a rationality square for a given artifact
- specify important properties of simple real-time systems and their components within predicate logic
- prove the correctness of specifications in propositional logic or predicate logic using an appropriate method
- divide systems hierarchically into their components
- prove that a system complies to certain properties using specifications in predicate logic of its components
- clearly present an analysis, a design and a correctness proof of a system
|
|
|
This is a course in applied logic. On the one hand, you will learn how to specify systems both informally in natural language and formally using propositional or predicate logic. Our goal is to describe these systems in such a way that these specifications can be used as a contract. On the other hand, you will learn how to prove these assertions, or in other words, to prove that these systems operate exactly as they should according to their contracts. This process of argumentation will also be done using natural language and using formal mathematical methods. Eventually, you will use a proof assistant to check your proof.
These techniques will be practiced in relatively small weekly exercises. They will be tested in written intermediate exams and a group project in which you will show that you can apply these techniques of assertion and argumentation on a complex system.
In addition, a short introduction is given about structural induction and about Kripke semantics in modal logic.
|
| | You need to have basic knowledge of propositional and predicate logic on the level of the courses Formal Reasoning or Mathematical Structures. It helps if you already did the course Languages and Automata. |
| The obligatory parts of this course are:
- Two interim exams which give the scores IE1 and IE2; the average score of IE1 and IE2 must be at least 5.0.
- A group project; the score P for this project must be at least 5.5.
- A Coq-practicum (also known as weekly tasks): the average score C of these weekly tasks must be at least 5.5.
Under the assumption that all requirements for the obligatory parts are met, the final grade F is MIN(10, ((IE1+IE2)/2 + P)/2).
In all other situations, the final grade F is MIN(5, ((IE1+IE2)/2 + P)/2).
Final grades will be rounded in the normal way. |
| This course was previously known as 'Beweren en Bewijzen' and 'Assertion and Argumentation'. |
|
|
|
This course was previously known as 'Beweren en Bewijzen' and 'Assertion and Argumentation'. |
- System development (artifacts, rationality squares, foci, domain models, functional networks, components, specifications, correctness theorems) - Grammar (propositional logic, predicate logic) - Systematic translation (natural language to predicate logic) - Proof rules (natural language, natural deduction) - Proofs (natural language, truth tables, semantic tableaux in propositional logic, natural deduction in propositional logic and predicate logic, structural induction) - Using the proof assistant Coq - Modal logic (Kripke models, S5) |
|
The obligatory parts of this course are: - Two interim exams which give the scores IE1 and IE2; the average score of IE1 and IE2 must be at least 5.0. - A group project; the score P for this project must be at least 5.5. - A Coq-practicum (also known as weekly tasks): the average score C of these weekly tasks must be at least 5.5.
Under the assumption that all requirements for the obligatory parts are met, the final grade F is MIN(10, ((IE1+IE2)/2 + P)/2).
In all other situations, the final grade F is MIN(5, ((IE1+IE2)/2 + P)/2).
Final grades will be rounded in the normal way. |
You need to have basic knowledge of propositional and predicate logic on the level of the courses Formal Reasoning or Mathematical Structures. It helps if you already did the course Languages and Automata. |
| | | Aanbevolen materiaalBoekThis book is useful for background information, but we don't actively use it within the course. |
ISBN | : | | 9780521543101 |
Titel | : | | Logic in Computer Science |
Auteur | : | | Huth and Ryan |
Uitgever | : | | Cambridge University Press |
|
|
WerkvormenCourseAanwezigheidsplicht | | Ja |
Opmerking168 hours.
| Lecture Opmerking28 hours.
| ProjectAanwezigheidsplicht | | Ja |
AlgemeenVoor dit vak dient er een groepswerkstuk te worden gemaakt. Opmerking20 hours.
| Response lecture AlgemeenIn het begin van de cursus zijn er groepen van 45 minuten. Aan het eind van de cursus worden er meestal groepen samengevoegd zodat er bijeenkomsten van 90 minuten ontstaan. Voorbereiding bijeenkomstenHet is verplicht om een leertaak te hebben ingeleverd om deel te mogen nemen aan het responsiecollege. Opmerking14 hours.
| Self study Opmerking78 hours.
| Tutorial Opmerking28 hours.
|
| ToetsenDigital Intermediate Test 1Weging | | 0 |
Toetsvorm | | Digitale toets met CIRRUS |
Gelegenheden | | Blok KW4, Blok KW4 |
| Digital Intermediate Test 2Weging | | 0 |
Toetsvorm | | Digitale toets met CIRRUS |
Gelegenheden | | Blok KW4, Blok KW4 |
| ProjectWeging | | 0 |
Toetsvorm | | Project |
Gelegenheden | | Blok KW4, Blok KW4 |
| Coq AssignmentsWeging | | 0 |
Toetsvorm | | Opdracht |
Gelegenheden | | Blok KW4, Blok KW4 |
| Final GradeWeging | | 1 |
Toetsvorm | | Tentamen |
Gelegenheden | | Blok KW4, Blok KW4 |
|
|
| | |
| |
| |